As one of the 2,500 folks who stood on the steps of the Custom House in downtown Charleston on April 15, 2009, I was heartened to see the backlash against out of control government. I was part of a massive crowd and was surrounded by an endless sea of signs saying things like “Cull Both Herds” with a picture of a Republican elephant and Democrat donkey. Speakers spoke out against not only Barack Obama but against George W. Bush too. They rallied against the bailouts, TARP, and omnibus budget package with the understanding that both parties shared the blame. The crowd was there not only to rally against Democrats, but against Republicans too — against any politician of any party who didn’t stand for the principle of limited government.

teaparty2009Imagine my disappointment when I read this article on the Charleston Tea Party web site this weekend entitled “Shut Up and WIN!” by Mike Murphree, chairman of this group that bears the name of the tea party movement in Charleston.

Chairman Murphree opens up by writing, “My fellow Republicans, shut up and win. That’s right shut up, and win!”

What exactly is this “fellow Republicans” line? I am a Republican myself but I thought the tea party was non-partisan. I must have thought wrong because evidently, the Charleston Tea Party is now a Republican organization that exists to tell its members to shut up and quit complaining about the very things that prompted them all to protest in 2009 in the first place. Instead, work to elect every bozo who runs with an “R” by his name. Great, pretty much no different than the RNC itself. Just what we need.

Mr. Murphree goes on to write, “It is time to fight progressives (most Democrats), and any other manner of ‘feces'; we are the party of Reagan; we are the Great Opportunity Party; we are the party of freemen and the party of the American Dream.”

To a certain extent I agree with Murphree that we need to fight progressivism. But in order to do so, the Republican Party must nominate candidates for office who themselves are not progressives. That is why we must take a stand in the primaries. And yes, that means disagreeing with “fellow Republicans.” Does that mean we may hurt the feelings of some politicians who run as Republicans but govern more like Barack Obama? Sure. It’s not personal, it’s just we want to be a free people.

No, Charleston Tea Party, we aren’t just going to “shut up and win” races for the GOP. We are going to continue advancing fiscally conservative, pro-liberty candidates in primaries because we believe in principles. And we thought you did too. So what happened?

Thankfully, the spirit of the Tea Party movement lives on in Charleston. While the Charleston Tea Party has largely faded away as a real grassroots organization and doesn’t actually do anything any longer, the various 9/12 project chapters across the Charleston area are a force to be reckoned with. (Major props to the Mount Pleasant, Goose Creek, and Summerille 9/12 groups!) Their members and Republican Liberty Caucus members work together in a spirit of friendship to advance our shared vision of limited government. We don’t always agree 100%, but we agree most of the time, and I know the real tea party banner is carried by them and they have my respect and admiration.

So perhaps the real conclusion I draw from taking a look at the organization called the “Charleston Tea Party” is that it isn’t really the tea party in Charleston at all. It’s a meaningless name, just like the meaningless “R” behind the names of all too many politicians they want us to just “shut up” and support.

To my true tea party friends and patriots I say this:  Don’t shrink back. Don’t settle for an “R.” Don’t shut up; instead, make some noise and win and win big! You are the ones who are fighting for the just and moral cause of liberty and don’t let anyone talk you out of doing what is right.

UPDATE: Charleston Tea Party Vice Chairman Joanne Jones says that Mike Murphree wrote his article outside his capacity as Charleston Tea Party Chairman. That still begs the question why the chairman of a tea party organization would tell tea party members to just “shut up” and back Republicans. However, the Charleston Tea Party web site prominently links to the article, also on the Charleston Tea Party web site. It is also promoted on the Charleston Tea Party Facebook and Twitter feeds. In fact, it’s the first post on the organization’s Facebook page since October. In the post, Charleston Tea Party writes, “Who says winning isn’t everything…” So it sure appears to be something from the Charleston Tea Party even though they claim it isn’t. You can decide.





Related Articles

12 Responses to Charleston Tea Party Chairman: Shut Up and Support Republicans

  1. Ronda says:

    For instance, if you’ll be giving away souvenirs to corporate clients, you would want to choose a drive that’s not flashy
    with loud colors. If you are giving wine or a wine gift basket, it
    is better to ask permission or get details regarding whether the person actually
    drinks (or might drink too much and not want temptation).
    It also calls attention to the entire staff that the employee has been rewarded.

  2. They know the merchandise by the reputation of the product.

    In every gathering they will go to, they can put on a quite show that
    he is someone responsible that mean business.

    It also calls attention to the entire staff that the employee has been rewarded.

  3. Syreeta says:

    Hi outstanding website! Does running a blog such as this take a large amount of work?
    I have no expertise in computer programming
    however I was hoping to start my own blog in the near future.
    Anyhow, if you have any suggestions or techniques for
    new blog owners please share. I know this is off
    topic however I simply needed to ask. Many thanks!

  4. This really disappoints me. We are fighting a similar mentality in North Carolina. I am the President of the Charlotte Tea Party (CAUTION) and am supporting a US Senate candidate named Greg Brannon. Supporters of our major rival, the current House Speaker who’s being backed by Karl Rove and other anti-TEA Party folks, are constantly harping on “Party loyalty” while forgetting that values and philosophical beliefs must come first. It is not only intellectually dishonest to elevate Party over principles, but the damage done by elevating the wrong Republicans can be just as damaging as electing Democrats. It does not help the conservative movement to be forced into supporting bad candidates who work against your values. It is difficult to grow a movement when you claim to believe one set of principles but support people who do the opposite. At least when a Democrat is in office you know who the enemy is and confront them.

    To all my LiberTEA friends, stand strong. Remember that the Republican Party is just a tool. It is the mechanism by which we can elect good candidates. It is not a belief system and blind loyalty is no virtue. Votes must be earned. Period.

  5. I think you may have missed his point. He doesn’t want to leave Graham in office. In fact he says, “Ten months is when we vote, we must change the US Senate and we must improve our margins in the US House.” He wants change as much as the rest of us. He’s just pointing out the obvious. If the Conservatives can’t figure out how to work together, we’ll lose what we’ve got and not gain anything.

    Our goal needs to be to change the Republican Party from the inside out. No, I’m not going to accept whatever is shoved down my throat; but I do think we need to be talking about what it means to be a Repulican and teach the party to mind our values and not their agenda!


    • 5 months is when we vote in the primary. That’s the point. He would have us “shut up” and ignore the primary instead of bringing the fight to the progressive Republicans.

      • I guess that since I don’t know him personally, I can’t know his heart, but we only have two US Senators in our state and no one wants Senator Scott out, yet he said “we must change the US Senate”, so I think he’s trying to stop the infighting between the supporters of the Graham challengers. Maybe you know him and you know something I don’t, but that’s what I see. ;-)

        • Eric Varnado says:

          Scott voted for the treasonous NDAA. You should want him out for supporting the worst legislation in recent history and the main point for Obama’s impeachment. Obviously Graham is far worse though.

  6. Tom Utley says:

    It’s odd timing for an article like this, isn’t it? The Republican primaries are starting to get going, especially the senate race where Lindsey Graham is the incumbent. This is the time to debate the issues and figure out which Republican candidate best represents us. But instead of doing that, the “tea party” leader would rather we all just shut up and vote R. But which R? Well I guess that doesn’t matter, right?

  7. It really is about you, isn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can
take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...